Skip to content

EthenEthenEthen

Amazon · Flagships Analysis

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (low)

Intelligence, Performance & Price Analysis

Canonical slug: nova-2-0-pro-reasoning-low · Canonical model registry at build time

Intelligence

20 score

Speed

135.3 output tokens/sec

Latency

13.08s TTFT

Input Price

$1.25 / 1M tokens

Output Price

$10.00 / 1M tokens

Verbosity

12M Output tokens from Intelligence Index 1 out of 4 units for Verbosity . Compa

Executive Assessment

Routing Verdict & Tradeoffs

Ethen Routing Verdict

Strong general-purpose model

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (low) scores 20 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it below average among other reasoning models in a similar price tier (median: 28). Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (low) generates output at 135.3 tokens per second (based on Amazon's API), which is above average compared to other reasoning models in a similar price tier (median: 81.2 t/s). Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (low) costs $1.25 per 1M input tokens (better than average, median: $1.50) and $10.00 per 1M output tokens (somewhat higher than average, median: $8.40), based on Amazon's API.

Suitable for most production tasks, but high-volume or repetitive work should still be compared against cheaper routes.

Task Fit Assessment

WorkloadRatingNotes
Complex reasoning & agentic workflowsoptimalIntelligence score 20 supports capable reasoning, but very hard tasks may benefit from higher-tier models.
High-volume chat & customer-facingoptimalOutput speed 135.3 tokens/sec and capable intelligence make this suitable for real-time chat at scale.
Latency-sensitive applicationsviableTTFT 13.08s — latency may be noticeable in interactive use.
Cost-sensitive pipelinesviableOutput pricing at $10.00 is premium. Route high-volume simple tasks to cheaper alternatives.

Cost Pressure Analysis

High

Pricing is premium — input $1.25, output $10.00. This model is expensive for high-volume or output-heavy workloads.

Cheaper substitutes: Lower-cost models for repetitive or high-volume work, Cache-backed reuse for repeated prompts

Technical Specifications

Architecture and Limits

SpecificationValueValidation Authority
Model typeProprietaryinferred
ReasoningYesfaq
Input modalitiesNova 2.0 Pro Preview (low) supports text and image input.faq
Output modalitiesNova 2.0 Pro Preview (low) supports text output.faq
Context window260k tokensfaq
Open weights / sourceNo, Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (low) is proprietary. The model weights are not publicly available.faq
ParametersNova 2.0 Pro Preview (low) is a proprietary model and Amazon has not disclosed the model size or parameter count.faq
API availabilityYes, Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (low) is available via API through 1 provider.faq

Evidence charts

Profile visualizations

Charts are the same canonical evidence cards previously published for this slug, contained inside the D18D page grammar.

AA-Omniscience Index

AA-Omniscience Index (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct. · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis

Retrieved 2026-07-08

Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.

Retrieval date:
2026-07-08
Methodology:
Independent test run by Artificial Analysis on dedicated hardware.

0204060Claude Fable 5 (with fallback): 4040AClaude Fable 5 (with fal…Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 3333GGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewClaude Opus 4.8 (max): 2727AClaude Opus 4.8 (max)Claude Opus 4.7 (max): 2626AClaude Opus 4.7 (max)Gemini 3.5 Flash: 2323GGemini 3.5 FlashGPT-5.5 (xhigh): 2020AIGPT-5.5 (xhigh)GPT-5.5 (high): 1818AIGPT-5.5 (high)Grok 4.3 (high): 1818xGrok 4.3 (high)GPT-5.5 (medium): 1717AIGPT-5.5 (medium)Claude Sonnet 5 (max): 1515AClaude Sonnet 5 (max)

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis

Retrieved 2026-07-08

Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.

Retrieval date:
2026-07-08
Methodology:
Independent test run by Artificial Analysis on dedicated hardware.

0204060Claude Fable 5 (with fallback): 6060AClaude Fable 5 (with fal…Claude Opus 4.8 (max): 5656AClaude Opus 4.8 (max)GPT-5.5 (xhigh): 5555AIGPT-5.5 (xhigh)Claude Opus 4.7 (max): 5454AClaude Opus 4.7 (max)Claude Sonnet 5 (max): 5353AClaude Sonnet 5 (max)GPT-5.5 (high): 5353AIGPT-5.5 (high)GPT-5.4 (xhigh): 5151AIGPT-5.4 (xhigh)GLM-5.2 (max): 5151?GLM-5.2 (max)GPT-5.5 (medium): 5050AIGPT-5.5 (medium)Gemini 3.5 Flash: 5050GGemini 3.5 Flash

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis

Retrieved 2026-07-08

Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.

Retrieval date:
2026-07-08
Methodology:
Independent test run by Artificial Analysis on dedicated hardware.

0204060Claude Fable 5 (with fallback): 6060AClaude Fable 5 (with fal…Claude Opus 4.8 (max): 5656AClaude Opus 4.8 (max)GPT-5.5 (xhigh): 5555AIGPT-5.5 (xhigh)Claude Opus 4.7 (max): 5454AClaude Opus 4.7 (max)Claude Sonnet 5 (max): 5353AClaude Sonnet 5 (max)GPT-5.5 (high): 5353AIGPT-5.5 (high)GPT-5.4 (xhigh): 5151AIGPT-5.4 (xhigh)GLM-5.2 (max): 5151?GLM-5.2 (max)GPT-5.5 (medium): 5050AIGPT-5.5 (medium)Gemini 3.5 Flash: 5050GGemini 3.5 Flash

Intelligence

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis

Retrieved 2026-07-08

Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.

Retrieval date:
2026-07-08
Methodology:
Independent test run by Artificial Analysis on dedicated hardware.

0204060Claude Fable 5 (with fallback): 6060AClaude Fable 5 (with fal…GPT-5.5 (xhigh): 5555AIGPT-5.5 (xhigh)GLM-5.2 (max): 5151?GLM-5.2 (max)Gemini 3.5 Flash: 5050GGemini 3.5 FlashMiniMax-M3: 4444?MiniMax-M3DeepSeek V4 Pro (max): 4444DDeepSeek V4 Pro (max)Kimi K2.6: 4444KKimi K2.6Muse Spark: 4343?Muse SparkNemotron 3 Ultra: 3838NNemotron 3 UltraGrok 4.3 (high): 3838xGrok 4.3 (high)

Output Speed

Output tokens per second · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis

Retrieved 2026-07-08

Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.

Retrieval date:
2026-07-08
Methodology:
Independent test run by Artificial Analysis on dedicated hardware.

088175263350gpt-oss-120b (high): 314314AIgpt-oss-120b (high)Nemotron 3 Ultra: 250250NNemotron 3 UltraGLM-5.2 (max): 218218?GLM-5.2 (max)Qwen3.7 Max: 206206QQwen3.7 MaxGemini 3.5 Flash: 192192GGemini 3.5 FlashGPT-5.4 mini (xhigh): 179179AIGPT-5.4 mini (xhigh)GPT-5.4 (xhigh): 175175AIGPT-5.4 (xhigh)Grok 4.3 (high): 164164xGrok 4.3 (high)Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 152152GGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewNova 2.0 Pro Preview (low): 135135?Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (lo…

Speed

Output tokens per second · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis

Retrieved 2026-07-08

Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.

Retrieval date:
2026-07-08
Methodology:
Independent test run by Artificial Analysis on dedicated hardware.

088175263350gpt-oss-120b (high): 314314AIgpt-oss-120b (high)Nemotron 3 Ultra: 250250NNemotron 3 UltraGLM-5.2 (max): 218218?GLM-5.2 (max)Gemini 3.5 Flash: 192192GGemini 3.5 FlashGrok 4.3 (high): 164164xGrok 4.3 (high)Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (low): 135135?Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (lo…MiniMax-M3: 9999?MiniMax-M3GPT-5.5 (xhigh): 8888AIGPT-5.5 (xhigh)Kimi K2.6: 7676KKimi K2.6DeepSeek V4 Pro (max): 7272DDeepSeek V4 Pro (max)

End-to-End Response Time

Seconds to output 500 tokens, including reasoning model 'thinking' time · Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis

Retrieved 2026-07-08

Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.

Retrieval date:
2026-07-08
Methodology:
Independent test run by Artificial Analysis on dedicated hardware.

0s2.5s5s7.5s10sKimi K2.7 Code: 9.7s9.7sKKimi K2.7 CodeClaude Opus 4.7 (max): 8.9s8.9sAClaude Opus 4.7 (max)Claude Opus 4.8 (max): 7.6s7.6sAClaude Opus 4.8 (max)Grok Build 0.1 0616: 7.2s7.2sxGrok Build 0.1 0616DeepSeek V4 Pro (max): 7s7sDDeepSeek V4 Pro (max)GPT-5.5 (medium): 6.9s6.9sAIGPT-5.5 (medium)Kimi K2.6: 6.6s6.6sKKimi K2.6GLM-5.1: 6.3s6.3s?GLM-5.1GPT-5.5 (low): 6.1s6.1sAIGPT-5.5 (low)GPT-5.5 (high): 6s6sAIGPT-5.5 (high)

Latency: Time To First Answer Token

Seconds to first answer token received · Accounts for reasoning model 'thinking' time · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis

Retrieved 2026-07-08

Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.

Retrieval date:
2026-07-08
Methodology:
Independent test run by Artificial Analysis on dedicated hardware.

0s25s50s75s100sDeepSeek V4 Pro (max): 61s61sDDeepSeek V4 Pro (max)Kimi K2.6: 58s58sKKimi K2.6GLM-5.1: 48s48s?GLM-5.1Kimi K2.7 Code: 43s43sKKimi K2.7 CodeGrok Build 0.1 0616: 29s29sxGrok Build 0.1 0616MiniMax-M3: 20s20s?MiniMax-M3Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (low): 15s15s?Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (lo…Qwen3.7 Max: 12s12sQQwen3.7 MaxGLM-5.2 (max): 9.2s9.2s?GLM-5.2 (max)Nemotron 3 Ultra: 9.1s9.1sNNemotron 3 Ultra

Context Window

Context window: tokens limit · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis

Retrieved 2026-07-08

Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.

Retrieval date:
2026-07-08
Methodology:
Independent test run by Artificial Analysis on dedicated hardware.

0500k1M1.5M2MGPT-5.4 (xhigh): 1.1M1.1MAIGPT-5.4 (xhigh)Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1M1MGGemini 3.5 FlashClaude Fable 5 (with fallback): 1M1MAClaude Fable 5 (with fal…GLM-5.2 (max): 1M1M?GLM-5.2 (max)DeepSeek V4 Pro (max): 1M1MDDeepSeek V4 Pro (max)Grok 4.3 (high): 1M1MxGrok 4.3 (high)MiniMax-M3: 1M1M?MiniMax-M3Claude Opus 4.8 (max): 1M1MAClaude Opus 4.8 (max)Claude Opus 4.7 (max): 1M1MAClaude Opus 4.7 (max)Claude Sonnet 5 (max): 1M1MAClaude Sonnet 5 (max)

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task, segmented by token type. Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis

Retrieved 2026-07-08

Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.

Retrieval date:
2026-07-08
Methodology:
Independent test run by Artificial Analysis on dedicated hardware.

00.51GPT-5.5 (xhigh): 0.10.1AIGPT-5.5 (xhigh)GPT-5.5 (high): 0.10.1AIGPT-5.5 (high)Gemini 3.5 Flash: 0.10.1GGemini 3.5 FlashGPT-5.5 (medium): 0.10.1AIGPT-5.5 (medium)GPT-5.4 (xhigh): 0.10.1AIGPT-5.4 (xhigh)GPT-5.5 (low): 00AIGPT-5.5 (low)GLM-5.1: 00?GLM-5.1Qwen3.7 Max: 00QQwen3.7 MaxGemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 00GGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGLM-5.2 (max): 00?GLM-5.2 (max)

Cost per Task

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis

Retrieved 2026-07-08

Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.

Retrieval date:
2026-07-08
Methodology:
Independent test run by Artificial Analysis on dedicated hardware.

$0.00$1.00$2.00$3.00$4.00$5.00Claude Fable 5 (with fallback): $2.75$2.75AClaude Fable 5 (with fal…GPT-5.5 (xhigh): $0.86$0.86AIGPT-5.5 (xhigh)Gemini 3.5 Flash: $0.59$0.59GGemini 3.5 FlashGLM-5.2 (max): $0.37$0.37?GLM-5.2 (max)Kimi K2.6: $0.35$0.35KKimi K2.6Nemotron 3 Ultra: $0.24$0.24NNemotron 3 UltraNova 2.0 Pro Preview (low): $0.21$0.21?Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (lo…Grok 4.3 (high): $0.14$0.14xGrok 4.3 (high)MiniMax-M3: $0.12$0.12?MiniMax-M3gpt-oss-120b (high): $0.06$0.06AIgpt-oss-120b (high)

Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Cost (USD) to run all evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis

Retrieved 2026-07-08

Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.

Retrieval date:
2026-07-08
Methodology:
Independent test run by Artificial Analysis on dedicated hardware.

050100150GPT-5.5 (xhigh): 132132AIGPT-5.5 (xhigh)GPT-5.5 (high): 119119AIGPT-5.5 (high)Gemini 3.5 Flash: 114114GGemini 3.5 FlashGPT-5.5 (medium): 9999AIGPT-5.5 (medium)GPT-5.4 (xhigh): 8989AIGPT-5.4 (xhigh)GPT-5.5 (low): 6565AIGPT-5.5 (low)Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 4949GGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3.7 Max: 4848QQwen3.7 MaxGLM-5.1: 4040?GLM-5.1Nemotron 3 Ultra: 3434NNemotron 3 Ultra

Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output

Price (USD per M Tokens) · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis

Retrieved 2026-07-08

Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.

Retrieval date:
2026-07-08
Methodology:
Independent test run by Artificial Analysis on dedicated hardware.

0250k500k750k1MClaude Opus 4.8 (max): 3131AClaude Opus 4.8 (max)Claude Sonnet 4.6 (max): 1818AClaude Sonnet 4.6 (max)GPT-5.4 (xhigh): 1818AIGPT-5.4 (xhigh)Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 1414GGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewClaude Sonnet 5 (max): 1212AClaude Sonnet 5 (max)Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning): 1212AClaude Sonnet 5 (Non-rea…Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (low): 1111?Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (lo…Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1111GGemini 3.5 FlashQwen3.7 Max: 1010QQwen3.7 MaxGLM-5.2 (max): 6.16.1?GLM-5.2 (max)cache Hitinputoutput

Time per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average decode time (minutes) per task; excludes TTFT and overhead time · Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis

Retrieved 2026-07-08

Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.

Retrieval date:
2026-07-08
Methodology:
Independent test run by Artificial Analysis on dedicated hardware.

02468Claude Opus 4.8 (max): 6.86.8AClaude Opus 4.8 (max)Claude Opus 4.7 (max): 5.95.9AClaude Opus 4.7 (max)Kimi K2.7 Code: 55KKimi K2.7 CodeGLM-5.1: 4.94.9?GLM-5.1Claude Fable 5 (with fallback): 4.84.8AClaude Fable 5 (with fal…MiniMax-M3: 3.93.9?MiniMax-M3Grok Build 0.1 0616: 3.83.8xGrok Build 0.1 0616GPT-5.5 (xhigh): 33AIGPT-5.5 (xhigh)GPT-5.4 (xhigh): 33AIGPT-5.4 (xhigh)GLM-5.2 (max): 2.82.8?GLM-5.2 (max)

Output Tokens per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average number of output tokens used to run one task in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis

Retrieved 2026-07-08

Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.

Retrieval date:
2026-07-08
Methodology:
Independent test run by Artificial Analysis on dedicated hardware.

050001000015000MiniMax-M3: 1162311623?MiniMax-M3Grok Build 0.1 0616: 1013110131xGrok Build 0.1 0616Gemini 3.5 Flash: 98199819GGemini 3.5 FlashClaude Opus 4.7 (max): 97579757AClaude Opus 4.7 (max)Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning): 97099709AClaude Sonnet 5 (Non-rea…GLM-5.1: 96859685?GLM-5.1Nemotron 3 Ultra: 77977797NNemotron 3 UltraClaude Fable 5 (with fallback): 76967696AClaude Fable 5 (with fal…gpt-oss-120b (high): 75717571AIgpt-oss-120b (high)Kimi K2.7 Code: 50665066KKimi K2.7 Code

Methodology

Methodology & Provenance

This page is rendered from the normalized profile and page JSON for Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (low).

Benchmark values are preserved as normalized; only layout, disclosure ordering, and typography are adjusted for readability.

Frequently Asked Questions

Model FAQs & Technical Disclosures

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (low) was released on November 27, 2025.