Intelligence
25 scoreNVIDIA · Flagships Analysis
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super
Intelligence, Performance & Price Analysis
Canonical slug: nvidia-nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b · Canonical model registry at build time
Speed
363.7 output tokens/secLatency
1.37s TTFTInput Price
$0.25 / 1M tokensOutput Price
$0.78 / 1M tokensVerbosity
110M Output tokens from Intelligence Index 4 out of 4 units for Verbosity . CompExecutive Assessment
Routing Verdict & Tradeoffs
Ethen Routing Verdict
Strong general-purpose model
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) scores 25 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it well above average among other open weight models of similar size (median: 9). NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) generates output at 363.7 tokens per second (based on the median across providers serving the model), which is well above average compared to other open weight models of similar size (median: 88.2 t/s). NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) costs $0.25 per 1M input tokens (better than average, median: $0.40) and $0.78 per 1M output tokens (better than average, median: $0.84), based on the median across providers serving the model.
Suitable for most production tasks, but high-volume or repetitive work should still be compared against cheaper routes.
Task Fit Assessment
| Workload | Rating | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Complex reasoning & agentic workflows | optimal | Intelligence score 25 supports capable reasoning, but very hard tasks may benefit from higher-tier models. |
| High-volume chat & customer-facing | optimal | Output speed 363.7 tokens/sec and capable intelligence make this suitable for real-time chat at scale. |
| Latency-sensitive applications | optimal | TTFT 1.37s — adequate latency for most interactive use cases. |
| Cost-sensitive pipelines | optimal | Output pricing at $0.78 is reasonable for moderate volume. |
Cost Pressure Analysis
Low
Pricing is competitive — input $0.25, output $0.78. Suitable for sustained production use.
Technical Specifications
Architecture and Limits
| Specification | Value | Validation Authority |
|---|---|---|
| Model type | Open weights | inferred |
| Reasoning | Yes | faq |
| Input modalities | NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) supports text input. | faq |
| Output modalities | NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) supports text output. | faq |
| Context window | NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) has a context window of 1.0M tokens. This determines how much text and conversation history the model can process in a single request. | faq |
| Open weights / source | Yes, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) is open weights. The model weights are publicly available and can be downloaded for self-hosting. | faq |
| Parameters | NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) has 120.6 billion parameters (12.7 billion active). | faq |
| Active parameters | NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) is a Mixture of Experts (MoE) model with 120.6 billion total parameters, but only 12.7 billion active parameters are used during inference. | faq |
| License | NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) is released under the Nvidia Nemotron Open Model License license. This license allows commercial use. | faq |
| API availability | Yes, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) is available via API through 4 providers. | faq |
Evidence charts
Profile visualizations
Charts are the same canonical evidence cards previously published for this slug, contained inside the D18D page grammar.
AA-Omniscience Index
AA-Omniscience Index (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct. · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Retrieved 2026-07-08
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
- Source:
- Published benchmark dataset
- Retrieval date:
- 2026-07-08
- Methodology:
- Independent test run by Artificial Analysis on dedicated hardware.
Bars intentionally show many models at once so the page feels like a benchmark report rather than a dashboard.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Retrieved 2026-07-08
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
- Source:
- Published benchmark dataset
- Retrieval date:
- 2026-07-08
- Methodology:
- Independent test run by Artificial Analysis on dedicated hardware.
Higher values indicate stronger overall capability. Bars show how models compare on composite intelligence metrics.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Retrieved 2026-07-08
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
- Source:
- Published benchmark dataset
- Retrieval date:
- 2026-07-08
- Methodology:
- Independent test run by Artificial Analysis on dedicated hardware.
Higher values indicate stronger overall capability. Bars show how models compare on composite intelligence metrics.
Artificial Analysis Openness Index: Score
Openness Index assesses model openness on a 0 to 100 normalized scale (higher is more open) · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Retrieved 2026-07-08
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
- Source:
- Published benchmark dataset
- Retrieval date:
- 2026-07-08
- Methodology:
- Independent test run by Artificial Analysis on dedicated hardware.
Bars intentionally show many models at once so the page feels like a benchmark report rather than a dashboard.
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Retrieved 2026-07-08
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
- Source:
- Published benchmark dataset
- Retrieval date:
- 2026-07-08
- Methodology:
- Independent test run by Artificial Analysis on dedicated hardware.
Higher values indicate stronger overall capability. Bars show how models compare on composite intelligence metrics.
Output Speed
Output tokens per second · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Retrieved 2026-07-08
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
- Source:
- Published benchmark dataset
- Retrieval date:
- 2026-07-08
- Methodology:
- Independent test run by Artificial Analysis on dedicated hardware.
Speed should be read together with latency and cost; fast output does not always mean better user-perceived performance.
Speed
Output tokens per second · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Retrieved 2026-07-08
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
- Source:
- Published benchmark dataset
- Retrieval date:
- 2026-07-08
- Methodology:
- Independent test run by Artificial Analysis on dedicated hardware.
Speed should be read together with latency and cost; fast output does not always mean better user-perceived performance.
End-to-End Response Time
Seconds to output 500 tokens, including reasoning model 'thinking' time · Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Retrieved 2026-07-08
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
- Source:
- Published benchmark dataset
- Retrieval date:
- 2026-07-08
- Methodology:
- Independent test run by Artificial Analysis on dedicated hardware.
Bars intentionally show many models at once so the page feels like a benchmark report rather than a dashboard.
Latency: Time To First Answer Token
Seconds to first answer token received · Accounts for reasoning model 'thinking' time · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Retrieved 2026-07-08
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
- Source:
- Published benchmark dataset
- Retrieval date:
- 2026-07-08
- Methodology:
- Independent test run by Artificial Analysis on dedicated hardware.
Latency includes thinking / reasoning time when applicable. Lower is better for interactive use cases.
Context Window
Context window: tokens limit · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Retrieved 2026-07-08
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
- Source:
- Published benchmark dataset
- Retrieval date:
- 2026-07-08
- Methodology:
- Independent test run by Artificial Analysis on dedicated hardware.
Larger context windows enable complex multi-turn tasks but may increase latency and cost for long inputs.
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task, segmented by token type. Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Retrieved 2026-07-08
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
- Source:
- Published benchmark dataset
- Retrieval date:
- 2026-07-08
- Methodology:
- Independent test run by Artificial Analysis on dedicated hardware.
Higher values indicate stronger overall capability. Bars show how models compare on composite intelligence metrics.
Ethen Gateway should route away from this model when the task is simple, repetitive, or likely to generate many output tokens.
Cost per Task
Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Retrieved 2026-07-08
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
- Source:
- Published benchmark dataset
- Retrieval date:
- 2026-07-08
- Methodology:
- Independent test run by Artificial Analysis on dedicated hardware.
Ethen Gateway should route away from this model when the task is simple, repetitive, or likely to generate many output tokens.
Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Cost (USD) to run all evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Retrieved 2026-07-08
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
- Source:
- Published benchmark dataset
- Retrieval date:
- 2026-07-08
- Methodology:
- Independent test run by Artificial Analysis on dedicated hardware.
Higher values indicate stronger overall capability. Bars show how models compare on composite intelligence metrics.
Ethen Gateway should route away from this model when the task is simple, repetitive, or likely to generate many output tokens.
Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output
Price (USD per M Tokens) · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Retrieved 2026-07-08
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
- Source:
- Published benchmark dataset
- Retrieval date:
- 2026-07-08
- Methodology:
- Independent test run by Artificial Analysis on dedicated hardware.
Bars intentionally show many models at once so the page feels like a benchmark report rather than a dashboard.
Time per Intelligence Index Task
Weighted average decode time (minutes) per task; excludes TTFT and overhead time · Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Retrieved 2026-07-08
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
- Source:
- Published benchmark dataset
- Retrieval date:
- 2026-07-08
- Methodology:
- Independent test run by Artificial Analysis on dedicated hardware.
Higher values indicate stronger overall capability. Bars show how models compare on composite intelligence metrics.
Model Size: Total and Active Parameters
Comparison between total model parameters and parameters active during inference · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Retrieved 2026-07-08
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
- Source:
- Published benchmark dataset
- Retrieval date:
- 2026-07-08
- Methodology:
- Independent test run by Artificial Analysis on dedicated hardware.
Larger models generally perform better but cost more to serve. Active parameter count matters for inference efficiency.
Output Tokens per Intelligence Index Task
Weighted average number of output tokens used to run one task in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Retrieved 2026-07-08
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
- Source:
- Published benchmark dataset
- Retrieval date:
- 2026-07-08
- Methodology:
- Independent test run by Artificial Analysis on dedicated hardware.
Higher values indicate stronger overall capability. Bars show how models compare on composite intelligence metrics.
Methodology
Methodology & Provenance
This page is rendered from the normalized profile and page JSON for NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super.
Benchmark values are preserved as normalized; only layout, disclosure ordering, and typography are adjusted for readability.
Frequently Asked Questions
Model FAQs & Technical Disclosures
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) was released on March 11, 2026.
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) was created by NVIDIA.
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) scores 25 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it well above average among other open weight models of similar size (median: 9).
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) generates output at 363.7 tokens per second (based on the median across providers serving the model), which is well above average compared to other open weight models of similar size (median: 88.2 t/s).
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) has a time to first token (TTFT) of 1.37s (based on the median across providers serving the model), which is better than average compared to other open weight models of similar size (median: 1.52s).
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) costs $0.25 per 1M input tokens (better than average, median: $0.40) and $0.78 per 1M output tokens (better than average, median: $0.84), based on the median across providers serving the model.
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) costs $0.25 per 1M input tokens and $0.78 per 1M output tokens (based on the median across providers serving the model). For a blended rate (7:2:1 cache hit/input/output ratio), this is $0.23 per 1M tokens. Pricing may vary by provider.
When evaluated on the Intelligence Index, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) generated 110M output tokens, which is at the higher end compared to other open weight models of similar size (median: 59M).
Yes, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) is a reasoning model. It uses extended thinking or chain-of-thought reasoning to work through complex problems before providing an answer.
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) supports text input.
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) supports text output.
No, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) does not support image input. It can only process text.
No, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) is not multimodal. It only supports text input.
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) has a context window of 1.0M tokens. This determines how much text and conversation history the model can process in a single request.
Yes, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) is open weights. The model weights are publicly available and can be downloaded for self-hosting.
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) has 120.6 billion parameters (12.7 billion active).
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) is a Mixture of Experts (MoE) model with 120.6 billion total parameters, but only 12.7 billion active parameters are used during inference.
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) is released under the Nvidia Nemotron Open Model License license. This license allows commercial use.
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) achieves a score of 25 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. This composite benchmark evaluates models across reasoning, knowledge, mathematics, and coding.
Yes, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) is available via API through 4 providers.
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) is available through 4 API providers.