Security teams
Make the finding easier to verify.
Connect defensive findings to code context, uncertainty, and remediation questions for human security review.
The Work
Give triage the evidence it needs.
- 01
Understand the change
Inspect available code and security-relevant assumptions.
- 02
Organize findings
Record affected areas, severity context, and uncertainty.
- 03
Prepare follow-up
Connect remediation questions to evidence and validation needs.
Example Workflow
Example: review an authentication change.
An illustrative process to adapt to supported capabilities.
- 01
Define the scope
Identify the diff, code paths, and questions to examine.
- 02
Prepare findings
Attach available evidence and distinguish concerns from confirmed issues.
- 03
Validate the next step
Have security reviewers assess severity and remediation before changes proceed.
Review
Validate the finding before acting.
This is defensive review, not offensive exploitation. People validate findings and approve sensitive changes. Vulnerability discovery and security certification are not guaranteed. Local execution requires a supported runtime and configuration; workspace services may still connect to the cloud.
Related Products
Explore the tools for this work.
FAQ
Can Ethen replace security reviewers?
No. It helps organize defensive analysis and evidence for human validation.
What can remain with a finding?
Referenced code, assumptions, review notes, and remediation context, where the supported surface records them.