Real-or-fake image check
According to the model card, the model checks whether an image is real or fake, meaning AI-generated.
Open Source Model Profile · dima806
ai_vs_real_image_detection is an 85.8M-parameter ViT image classifier from dima806. According to the model card, it checks whether an image is real or AI-generated, with an explicit warning about concept drift.
ai_vs_real_image_detection is published by dima806 as an image-classification model. The captured configuration identifies ViTForImageClassification with a vit model type, and Safetensors metadata reports 85800194 parameters. Hub tags associate it with google/vit-base-patch16-224-in21k as base and fine-tune, while the card describes real-versus-fake image checking.
According to the model card, the model checks whether an image is real or fake, meaning AI-generated.
Hub tags list google/vit-base-patch16-224-in21k as both base model and fine-tune, with a captured ViTForImageClassification config.
The publisher warns the training data is about two years old, notes significant concept drift from newer deepfake generators, and recommends retraining over threshold adjustment.
The card points to a Kaggle notebook for further CIFAKE ViT training details.
Source: dima806/ai_vs_real_image_detection
Captured: Unknown. Processed: 2026-09-07T19:34:43.551913+00:00.
Checks whether the image is real or fake (AI-generated). Note to users who want to use this model in production: Beware that this model is trained on a dataset collected about 2 years ago. Since then, there is a remarkable progress in generating deepfake images with common AI tools, resulting in a significant concept drift. To mitigate that, I urge you to retrain the model using the latest available labeled data. As a quick-fix approach, simple reducing the threshold (say from default 0.5 to 0.1 or even 0.01) of labelling image as a fake may suffice. However, you will do that at your own risk, and retraining the model is the better…
F001F002F003F004F005F006F007F008F009F010F011F012F013F014